Will Government Play Fair with Tire Crumb Synthetic Turf?
The government has been passed the ball
-- to conduct a realistic and credible study of tire crumb synthetic turf.
The following is a chronicling of its progress, (and history).
Will California have what it takes?
-- to conduct a realistic and credible study of tire crumb synthetic turf.
The following is a chronicling of its progress, (and history).
Will California have what it takes?
1) The Feds Punt
"It should have been corrected a long time ago", toxicologist Suzanne Wuerthele told ESPN about the report she sent from her regional US/EPA office in Denver to the national EPA headquarters in Washington DC in 2008.
|
Today a growing number of world class athletes, medical professionals, parents, and public figures voice similar sentiments as they blog, tweet, and speak out more and more about their concerns regarding tire crumb synthetic turf -- and questioning what they see as the governments' lack of commitment to doing a meaningful study of its impacts on human health .
|
The turf in question is a green plastic carpet filled with ground up automobile and truck tires called tire crumb infill, (also called styrene-butadiene rubber or sbr). The combination of the turf and the tire crumb was first introduced into the market in the late 1990s.
|
Even though government agencies have warned athletes for years to wash their hands after playing in tire crumb synthetic turf -- no Federal agency to date has been willing to commit to an official position regarding the health risks involved in exposing athletes and children to the chemical’s in tire crumb. In fact some government agencies were seen as promoting its use.
|
The crux of the controversy is that tire manufacturers are not required by law to disclose the specific chemical elements used in the manufacturing of their products. The exact undisclosed chemical mixtures are treated as proprietary information. Industry records acknowledge though that hundreds of chemical compounds (including cancer causing human toxins) are used which can be found in tires and tire crumb.
|
The various secret chemical mixtures are difficult, if not impossible, to pin down -- especially after being mixed in with hundreds of other formula variations, as happens with the combining of the many thousands of different tires that it takes to make up tire crumb.
|
The tire industry went even further when it acknowledged that "there is an intrinsic chemical heterogeneity, (or variability), at the microscopic level of a tire related to their chemical composition".
Mixtures will vary depending on the manufacturer, the model, and the different parts of the tire that the individual particles are derived from. |
Variability is also exacerbated by the additional chemical elements that are picked up from the road environment which adhere to the tire -- including the uptake of lead & zinc, (partly from tire weights that were used extensively to balance tires for years), break lining particulates, and chemicals from diesel exhaust.
|
In 2015 a Yale University study was able to identify an additional 66 chemicals. Of the chemicals that were tested, 10 were found to be probable carcinogens and 19 were recognized as irritants to the respiratory system as well as the skin and eye. Gaboury Benoit, Ph.D., lead investigator of the Yale study said, "Not surprisingly, the shredded tires contain a veritable witch’s brew of toxic substances.
|
2) The Pile Up
The success of the tire industry business model has been dependent on their customers regularly replacing their automobile and truck tires. Even the greenest of vehicles are expected to go through multiple sets of synthetic rubber tires during their life-spans.
Over 1 billion tires are discarded annually. The waste tires have accumulated over the decades as a consequence, creating enormous tire repositories and hazardous illegal dumps -- setting the stage for dramatic toxic tire fires.
The world’s tire manufacturers recognized that its industry had a sizable problem along with a major public relations challenge. How could they maintain their profitable business model of manufacturing tires with a planned obsolescence of every few years, and also address the growing accumulating stockpiles of hazardous waste tires -- all the while appearing to be environmentally responsible?
3) A Hail Mary
In 2003, the the heads of the seven largest tire producers in the world gathered at a meeting in Lyon, France to form an international consortium.
Representatives from the tire manufacturers; (Bridgestone, Continental, Dunlop, Goodyear, Kléber, Michelin and Pirelli), all joined together to create a company which they called Aliapur. From these meetings sprang a strategy which included the re-purposing of waste tires into play surfaces for children and athletes. |
Just two years after Aliapur’s initial meeting -- the tire crumb synthetic turf "ball was rolling". The French flooring manufacturer Tarkett, Inc. increased its investment share in FieldTurf, (a Montreal-based brand of plastic turf surfaces). This led to the integration of the two companies, FieldTurf Tarkett.
Other artificial turf companies were also springing up using the same technology, (Shaw Sports Turf [formerly Sportexe], AstroTurf, and Sprinturf, LLC, etc.). |
The version of artificial turf which they would promote required a plastic carpet base upon which each square foot of turf would be covered with approximately three pounds of tire crumb, (approximately 90 tons per average athletic field).
For the production of the required plastic base’s polyethylene fibers and polypropylene backing, the new enterprises turned to carpet mills along the I-75 corridor in central Georgia (USA). FieldTurf moved its head corporate office to Calhoun, GA, its associate Shaw Sports Turf also set up in Calhoun, GA. AstroTurf is in Dalton, GA and Sprinturf, LLC based itself down the road in nearby Marietta, GA.
|
They joined together and formed the Synthetic Turf Council (STC) in Atlanta, GA to help to promote and lobby for the interests of their new tire crumb synthetic turf industry. To address the health issues, a full court press was launched with a network of lobbyists employed to spin their products as not posing a significant health risk to the general public and government officials across the country.
In 2015 the heads of three of the largest synthetic turf companies met with the Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairman, (CPSC), Elliot Kaye and his staff to address their difficulties with trying to convince the public that exposing athletes and children to tire crumb synthetic turf was without risk.
“None of us are wedded to the crumb rubber business”, Darren Gill of FieldTurf disingenuously insisted to the CPSC officials as he made his groups presentation, (which was ironically entitled "Crumb Rubber"), despite the fact that over 95% of the synthetic turf athletic fields that their companies install use crumb rubber as infill.
|
The Synthetic Turf Council tried to further disassociate its image from the tire crumb health risks by introducing various public relations and marketing campaigns such as their "See Turf Differently" campaign-- which includes a promotional video that omits any mention of, (or visual imagery of), tire crumb.
We don't have resources to spend hundreds of thousands or millions on lobbyists", Al Garver, the current STC president declared. Yet, over the years STC has employed multiple lobbyists -- including, in late 2015, when they hired Charles Spies of the Washington D.C. law firm Clark Hill, PLC. Spies was ostensibly hired by STC for “advice on congressional meetings” and a “letter to the EPA”. Spies is the head of his firm's national Political Law practice, and serves as counsel to multiple super PACs, (including what the firm's website boasts to be “the largest super PAC in history”).
|
“It's not like we're gearing up for this massive thing", insists Synthetic Turf Council president Garver.
But, perhaps one of the more telling signs that they are in fact gearing up, (and the lengths that they are willing to go), was in evidence when Synthetic Turf Council began hijacking the internet traffic that was searching for a citizen coalition's educational web site, (http://www.safehealthyplayingfields.org/), by usurping a version of the coalition's domain name -- and directing it to the Synthetic Turf Council website. |
4) Whistles are Blown About the Health Risks
National citizen grassroots groups like Safe Healthy Playing Fields Coalition, SHPFC and Turf Grass Forum stood up to provide educational information for local municipalities and individuals -- and to serve as a counterpoint to industry misinformation being promulgated by turf lobbyists.
|
"You take something with all kinds of hazardous materials and make it something kids play on?”, asked US/EPA toxicologist Suzanne Wuerthele as she raised concerns early on within her agency, saying in a report that “the EPA made a mistake in promoting this".
National news journalist/producer Hannah Rappleye along with Kevin Monihan and Monica Alba of NBC Nightly News recognized the problem early on -- and had been researching the issue for 2 years before they ran their first story on NBC Nightly News along with correspondent Stephanie Gosk.
|
In 2007 Guive Mirfendereski launched SynTurf.org, a web site that serves as an archive of reports, articles, and a world-wide forum, “dedicated to information regarding environmental and health risks associated with artificial turf fields”.
|
That same year, David Brown a toxicologist with Environmental and Human Health, Inc. / EHHI, (formerly with the CDC), projected that we would start seeing cancer cases within 10 years in children regularly exposed to tire crumb. "I wouldn't put a child on one of these fields," said Brown.
|
In 2008, television news station KOMO in Seattle introduced the story of soccer goalie Luke Beardemphl's battle with cancer, "the pellets go into my face, they go into my eyes, and my mouth."
|
Jeff Ruch, of the Washington D.C. based Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), has persistently questioned the Consumer Product Safety Commission about its refusal to categorize synthetic turf as a children's product despite it being
widely marketed to and for children. |
Actor Jennifer Beals spoke eloquently of her concerns about tire crumb synthetic turf exposures and the lack of a quality study at a Washington D.C. rally in 2013, "What's good for a tire is not good for a child."
|
US soccer player Sydney Larieux likened being exposed to tire crumb fields to being treated like test guinea pigs.
World Cup athletes Larieux, Abby Wambach, and fifty other international players raised awareness by filing a lawsuit against FIFA -- opposing the use of tire crumb synthetic turf at the 2015 Women's World Cup tournament. They received a promise from FIFA that it would never happen again. |
Pediatricians Dr. Philip Landrigan and Dr. Joel Forman of Mount Sinai Hospital have long led a chorus of health professionals expressing caution about exposing children to tire crumb synthetic turf. Landrigan notes , "Children are biologically more vulnerable... they have a long time in which to develop disease which may be triggered by early exposures."
|
Others expressing a need for a credible study include journalists, reporters, politicians, public health advocates, and athletes including; Dr. Kathleen Michels, toxicologist Suzanne Wuerthele, journalist Lynn Peeples,
journalist Melonie Woodrow, Dr. Mehmet Oz, athlete/ journalist Julie Foudy & ESPN, Dr. Kim Mulvihill, athlete Ethan Zohn, athlete Todd Hoffard, journalist Rachel Maddow, journalist Lawrence O'Donnell, former CA Lt. Governor Abel Maldonado, CA State Senator Jerry Hill, CA State Senator Mark Leno, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), U.S. Senator Bill Nelson (Florida), Dr. Homero Horari, journalist Joce Sterman, U.S. Congressman Fred Upton (Michigan), U.S. Congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey), public health advocate/actor Tom Hanks, athlete Kobe Bryant.
journalist Melonie Woodrow, Dr. Mehmet Oz, athlete/ journalist Julie Foudy & ESPN, Dr. Kim Mulvihill, athlete Ethan Zohn, athlete Todd Hoffard, journalist Rachel Maddow, journalist Lawrence O'Donnell, former CA Lt. Governor Abel Maldonado, CA State Senator Jerry Hill, CA State Senator Mark Leno, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), U.S. Senator Bill Nelson (Florida), Dr. Homero Horari, journalist Joce Sterman, U.S. Congressman Fred Upton (Michigan), U.S. Congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey), public health advocate/actor Tom Hanks, athlete Kobe Bryant.
5) California's Conflicted Goals
In 2015 the CPSC, the US/EPA, and the CDC all said that they are unable, (or unwilling), at the time to conduct any research of their own into the toxicity of tire crumb. However, they all stated that they were closely watching California.
In 2015, two California agencies -- the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, (OEHHA) in conjunction with CalRecycle -- announced that they would be conducting a study on, “the potential human health effects associated with the use of recycled waste tires in playground and synthetic turf products”. This will be the fourth attempt by OEHHA and CalRecycle at reporting on synthetic turf in eight years, (previous reports were done in 2007, 2009, & 2010).
|
NBC Nightly News reported that both the US/EPA and the Consumer Product Safety Commission say that they plan to involve their agencies in the California study, although, neither agency has any jurisdiction about how the study will be conducted or reported on – nor has either agency clarified exactly in what form their assistance might entail.
|
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, (OEHHA) and CalRecycle are both departments which operate under Cal/EPA. (note: Cal/EPA is not connected with the US/EPA).
On the other hand CalRecycle, (and its earlier incarnation: the California Integrated Waste Management Board, CIWMB), oversees the state’s recycling and waste management programs. CalRecycle has a long history of cooperation with the tire derived products (TDP) industries through its mandate to promote markets for waste tires. Since 1989 CalRecycle has awarded grants and loans to “expand markets for used tires”, (including tire crumb).
|
The CalRecycle web site notes, “In order to make these markets, (TDP), sustainable, a steady flow of materials into the marketplace...and continuous uses for product must also exist”, “The ongoing challenge for CalRecycle is to continue to develop viable markets.”
In what would appear to be a conflict of interest, in 2015 CalRecycle began a five-year plan to increase the statewide infrastructure for tire derived products (TDP). Their multi-year commitment to promoting TDP had already taken effect two months prior to the start of their study of the human health risks associated with TDP.
In its Report to the Legislature CalRecycle wrote, "To further stimulate the market, CalRecycle will continue the competitive pilot Tire Incentive Program (TIP)".
The TIP provides a reimbursement (as an incentive payment program) to businesses that use crumb rubber. |
6) Playing Both Sides
According to California State Senator Jerry Hill, special interests representing the tire recycling and crumb rubber turf industries, as well as labor interests and education officials spent over $3.4 million lobbying to oppose his Senate bill which had called for the study.
|
In Sacramento, the staff at CalRecycle find themselves in the untenable position of promoting tire crumb markets for their associates in the tire recycling industry and at STC – while at the same time attempting to present a plausible study exploring tire crumb’s health risks.
Conflicting decisions will undoubtedly have to be made by Calrecycle and OEHHA; some will steer the study toward serving and protecting the public health interests of children and athletes -- others will steer the study toward serving and protecting the private financial interests of their business associates. |
OEHHA shares responsibility for the makeup of the California study’s critical scientific expert advisory panel with Robert Carlson, (of CalRecycle’s Materials Management and Local Assistance Division). As study organizer, Carlson and OEHHA are tasked with convening a panel to help direct the departments on protocol development and study design.
In contrast, Carlson was also simultaneously serving as an organizer for the California Tire Conferences -- a yearly tire conference put together by CalRecycle which is devoted to helping expand the markets for waste tires. |
Ironically, (just two months after his new CalRecycle/OEHHA synthetic turf study was initiated), Robert Carlson participated on a panel at the 2015 Tire Conference. The topic of Carlson’s panel was entitled “Trends in Playground and Turf Markets - Responding to Challenges Regarding Health Aspects of Crumb Rubber”. Despite its subject matter, no public health professionals were included on the panel.
The panel was limited to Carlson and five synthetic turf industry representatives -- and was moderated by Denise Kennedy, a member of the Synthetic Turf Council. The panel included Terry Leveille, a spokesperson for the Synthetic Turf Council who is also a long-time registered lobbyist for the California Tire Dealers Association.
|
One slide presented by Leveille laid out in a dramatic fashion his view of the recent media coverage listing;
- October 8, 2014: NBC news reports on “How Safe is the Artificial Turf Your Child Plays On?”
- October 9, 2014: All hell breaks loose.
Joining Carlson, Kennedy, and other industry insiders, (including some prominent chemical manufacturers), was Ruben Rojas, (Deputy Executive Director of California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank). Rojas gave the keynote address which promoted California as "a Huge and Growing Market for the Synthetic Turf Industry, and a Bellwether for Where the Opportunities Await".
|
And so it was that -- in this loaded environment, and in this context -- California was to commence a new synthetic turf study.
7) California’s Track Record
Although their websites only lists two studies, in fact California’s Office of Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and CalRecycle have already overseen at least three reports on the health effects associated with use of recycled waste tires in playground and synthetic turf products, including;
Toxicologist Charles Vidair, (the OEHHA lead author of the previous California studies), acknowledged the inconsistencies of the existing studies when he pointed out, for instance, that; “chemical concentrations were consistently higher in the New York State study, ranging from 1.7-fold to 85-fold higher.” “These variable results highlight the difficulties faced in obtaining consistent results”.
When Vidair was asked during a televised interview about the short-comings of OEHHA’s own 2010 research – he stopped short and checked with an off-camera department press spokesperson before answering. Vidair then went on to explain how some of the measurements were inherently flawed and as such accurate conclusions were not to be expected.
|
Perhaps because of the data gaps and other shortcomings in OEHHA's existing research, the Synthetic Turf Council and others have consistently used it to support their claim to have found no significant health risk attached to tire crumb. Consequently, dozens of other subsequent reports across the country have exploited California’s OEHHA reports as the basis for their own acceptance of risk.
|
In June, 2015, OEHHA and CalRecycle signed their three-year contract for the current study which OEHHA will once again prepare as a report to CalRecycle -- this time at a cost of nearly three million dollars.
As described by the acting director of OEHHA, Lauren Zeise, and her associates at a series of public workshops -- this latest incarnation of a California synthetic turf study will primarily replicate the methodologies and goals of their, (and other’s), previous studies, (New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut have also done similarly limited studies).
|
This California study will also involve many of the same CalRecycle / OEHHA management and key personnel involved in the previous California studies, (including Zeise, the study administrators Robert Carlson and David Ting, and OEHHA Deputy Director for Scientific Affairs Melonie Marty).
|
Public input has been touted by CalRecycle and OEHHA as a goal of this study – yet the study’s three regional "world cafe style" workshops, (they were described as being like speed-dating), allowed little time for thoroughness, and the one public interactive webinar which was scheduled to last for one and a half hours, was inexplicably cut short by half, after only 45 minutes. Over 135 callers had logged in to the webinar from across the country only to hear 25 selected questions responded to by an OEHHA spokesperson -- repeatedly broken up with a rudimentary slide presentation.
|
The webinar ended shortly after the question was asked, “How will you assure the study doesn’t cause undue public fear”, The OEHHA spokesperson then inexplicably foretold, “That’s a hard question”…”we don’t want to cause alarm or panic.”
|
8) The Athlete’s and Parents’ Dilemma
“The possible toxic effects of exposure to any particular chemical depend on many factors.”
“Unfortunately, scientists have not been able to determine exactly how each of these factors will affect any specific individual so that present understanding of chemical exposures provides only general guidance.”,
from “Entry And Fate of Chemicals in Humans” by the EXTONET Project; (University of California Davis, Cornell University, Michigan State University, and Oregon State University).
“Unfortunately, scientists have not been able to determine exactly how each of these factors will affect any specific individual so that present understanding of chemical exposures provides only general guidance.”,
from “Entry And Fate of Chemicals in Humans” by the EXTONET Project; (University of California Davis, Cornell University, Michigan State University, and Oregon State University).
The study's advisory panel is to assist in the experimental design of the California research, and is the only group that is meeting formally. The panel was limited to six handpicked academicians and one representative from the US/EPA. The panelists are Edward Avol (USC), John Balmes M.D. (UCSF), Deborah Bennett (UC Davis), Sandy Eckel (USC), Amy Kyle (UC Berkeley), Thomas McKone, (UC Berkeley), and Linda Sheldon (US/EPA). None of the selected panelist's resumes show any previous experience with tire crumb synthetic turf.
At the Los Angeles study workshop a participant noted that, "at least out of respect for the athletes and the parents of the children fighting cancer -- if an independent experienced user is not represented on the advisory panel then the credibility of at least two of the studies stated goals; expert and stakeholder input and consultation & and exposure scenario development, could be called into question".
|
The study administrators have announced that they would webcast the panel meetings and allow non-panelists to “listen in on the conversation". Study administrators have said, submitted re-examination from non-panelists will then be potentially brought up or addressed "after the fact, at the end of the meeting, rather than have them involved within the conversation".
|
Insularity from experienced independent input during the panel's discussions could prohibit contested data points, clarifying visual aids, and illustrative demonstrations from being introduced and addressed in a timely and effective manner, (if at all). Nancy Alderman (president of the nonprofit Environmental and Human Health, Inc.) in Connecticut offered to fly out and participate on the scientific advisory panel. Alderman and her organization have been studying the issue for over a decade. Her offer was declined.
|
A Californian with expertise in exposure modeling and representation, (as well as over 21 years experience with synthetic turf athletic fields), offered to facilitate communicating the various technical modalities of tire crumb exposure for the study design panel. The volunteer had participated with previous synthetic turf studies -- in addition to being a former collegiate athlete and an official for adult & youth athletic leagues and was asked by parents and athletes to represent them on the panel. Both CalRecycle and OEHHA declined the offer.
|
9) Running Out the Clock?
Will California be spending nearly a million dollars a year for the next three years to simply enact a stall tactic -- enabling CalRecycle and the tire crumb industry to continue to expand its markets?
The California study, as laid out by the CalRecycle / OEHHA staff, seems to be once again going over territory that they (and others) have already covered -- primarily performing a limited number of superficial tests, then applying their findings to a statistically insufficient risk analysis? |
Regarding exposures to tire crumb, the US/EPA has advised that, “understanding human uptake or absorption is a key component in understanding risk" -- but with the limited scope of the proposed California study, and due to the un-quantifiable variability of tire crumb, a meaningful expectation of understanding would seem to be unrealistic.
|
It will remain to be seen if the California study (as proposed) can answer the most fundamental question being asked of it...
"What exactly are the athletes and children, who are ingesting these tire crumb chemicals doing to their bodies?"
"What exactly are the athletes and children, who are ingesting these tire crumb chemicals doing to their bodies?"
QWERTY Media Resources
For purposes of vetting as well as submissions -- go to Contact
Submitted scientific comments can be found by tapping on Comments on the Science
For purposes of vetting as well as submissions -- go to Contact
Submitted scientific comments can be found by tapping on Comments on the Science